How can the GOP claim to support the Constitution but not be willing to vote on the Supreme Court nominee?

up vote 0 down vote favorite

asked Mar 17 '16 at 05:05

Unnamed User
1 0 0 0

Can you answer these questions?

	Dog Tears Things Apart?
	What do you think about Fox News and Tex Cruz desperately trying to start a rumor that Trump is liberal?
	VASHIKARAN VOODOO SPELLS+91-9815804265 ALL LOVE SPELLS BABA JI CANADA

Your Answer

Related Content

	GOP Tries to Remain United on Supreme Court Stretegy Can the GOP Stay United on Strategy to Fight Obama's Supreme Court Nominee ? ... in opposition to confirming a Supreme Court nominee under President Obama. ... spent Friday building support around the idea that the Senate shouldnot vote or ... Most Republican senators fell in line, but a handful made ...
	Washington's Worst Job: President Obama's Next Supreme Court... The question is which one of them is willing to become this year's political ... Obama last nominated a Supreme Court justice in 2010, when he tapped ... But there is no indication that any Republican senator will vote to ... In a normal political year, he might not be at the top list. ... .. Support our Advertisers.
	GOP Obstruction of Obama Court Nomination -- Radical, Without ... GOP leaders claim there is "no precedent" for confirming a Supreme Courtnominee in an election year. ... The President has a Constitutional responsibility to appoint ... Though Marco Rubio may not be the sharpest math wiz, it should be ... But far from committing to hold a vote on an Obama Supreme Court ...

Related Questions

	15 Republicans said God wanted them to run, but the one guy who didn't is about to win the nomination. Why did God tell them all to run?
	Sarah Palin called Trump protesters "thugs" but her children are the REAL thugs?
	GEOPOLITICS: Why do you think Russia is pulling most of their troops from Syria?

Related Content

	The Constitution does not require the Senate to give judicial ... President Obama claims that the Senate has a constitutional duty to vote ... Senate has a duty to vote on his nominee to replace Supreme Court ... Both Democrats and Republicans have often blocked judicial nominations by filibustering ... But the Constitution does not establish different rules for Supreme ...
	Judiciary chair: 'Standard practice' to not confirm SCOTUS nominee... The Senate shouldn't confirm an Obama nominee to replace Scalia, says ... One example of a Supreme Court justice being confirmed to the ... He was confirmed in a 97-0 vote on Feb. ... And those bozos claim to support the Constitution. ... Obviously you are not but you could be if you found a way to use ...
	Updates on President Obama's Supreme Court nominee Merrick ... President Obama nominated federal Judge Merrick Garland to replace ... But Obama's announcement Wednesday that he will nominate ... Perhaps the biggest supporting role in the Supreme Court nomination battle goes to ... . Ted Cruz attacked not President Obama, but his own GOP rival Donald Trump.
	Senate Has the Constitution on Its Side - Bloomberg View Republican senators have said they will not confirm any Obama ... claim to be strict interpreters of the Constitution suddenly reading into it a whole ... vote on the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court ... Obama claims he has no litmus test, but has said that his judicial nominees will support Roe.
	Republicans Are Handling The Supreme Court Vacancy All Wrong ... Their strategy: stating that they will not approve anyone nominated by President Obama. ... are willing to do anything and everything to stack the courts. ... We are one vote on the Supreme Court away from gutting the Constitution wholesale ... As most of these oligarchs only support the garnering of power (I ...